🔗 Share this article

In today's Britain, public demonstration has ceased to be a fundamental right. Instead, it has become a conditional permission that those in power allow or withhold as they see fit. This constitutes the underlying meaning of new regulations that the ruling administration is advancing, which would determine the timing and location demonstrations can occur, with potential prison sentences for those who disobey these restrictions.

Gradual Weakening of Democratic Rights

Earlier governments had already weakened this fundamental freedom: the previous Tory administration had granted law enforcement sweeping additional powers, which global rights bodies had censured as "significant and unjustified restrictions" on civil liberties. Taken together, these progressive attacks on liberty have practically abolished the historically earned right to public demonstration.

Exploiting Tragedy to Rationalize Crackdown

The latest limitations are being defended by citing last week's heinous anti-Jewish assault on a British Islamic center. We can all agree on universal agreement that the safety of Jewish communities in Britain must be protected. However, using this horrific incident as a justification to stifle dissent is not only disconnected to that duty but distorts it.

"If you can't draw the line at genocide, you probably can't establish limits at democratic principles," observed a well-known American author, a statement that rings true for the current government.

Historical Context of Protest

Reflect on Britain's long tradition of protest and direct action against racism and fascism, from the historic 1936 Cable Street confrontation to postwar Jewish anti-fascist movements and the 1970s mobilizations against the far-right organization. Many of these early protesters were branded as extremists in their time, even while they were fighting for the rights of minorities.

Present Situation

In the current complex situation, here's what's truly happening: Israel – a foreign state – is perpetrating acts that international bodies have characterized as genocide. Its military actions have prompted the global justice body to issue arrest warrants against Benjamin Netanyahu and his ex-military leader.

International public opinion has changed significantly against Israel's military campaign. In Britain, a substantial majority of citizens think Israel has likely committed international law violations. Most people would endorse a total prohibition on arms sales to the nation, and approve the detention of Netanyahu.

Suppressing Opposition

Having essentially failed the argument, pro-Israel advocates are now exploiting a despicable antisemitic crime to try to silence a popular campaign against a moral catastrophe. The British government seems included in this attempt. Government officials have failed to implement comprehensive sanctions on Israel and have allowed arms exports to proceed.

People who are protesting against the erasure of Gaza have been characterized as hateful extremists. Yet there's a significant reason why there hasn't been a broader suppression on these protesters until now: extremely few protesters have made truly offensive statements about Jewish people, giving police authorities minimal reason to intervene.

Problematic Association

Equating Jewish identity with the policies of the Israeli state is not only manipulative but also harmful. The standard interpretation of anti-Jewish prejudice, adopted by the British government and numerous institutions, has been rightly questioned for potentially stifling legitimate criticism of Israel. However, there should be universal agreement about one of its key examples: that "making Jewish people generally accountable for decisions of the state of Israel" constitutes prejudice against Jews.

Increasing Limitations

This is why we've arrived at a point where police authorities can suggest that protests criticizing Israel's actions should be called off because they might "inadvertently or intentionally" support anti-Jewish sentiment. Similarly, government officials have stated that acknowledgment of Palestine as a nation has made political parties "implicated" in supposed mistreatment faced by British Jews.

Double Standards

On the same day as the religious center assault, the Israeli military killed dozens of Palestinian civilians in Gaza – increasing the horrific toll from 24 months of daily atrocities that have claimed many thousands of human lives. British political leaders and news organizations have barely concealed the minimal importance they assign to Palestinian existence. This represents one of the most brazen demonstrations of racism in our time.

Crossing Thresholds

Our government has already passed a concerning threshold by proscribing a specific activist group, a peaceful, anti-genocide direct action organization. Multiple thousands of British protesters have been detained, primarily for carrying placards opposing genocide and supporting the proscribed group. Many of those arrested are pensioners; among them a former clergyman and the child of a Holocaust survivor.

International Parallels

It's easy to see where this trajectory leads. In the United States, government officials helped vilify pro-Palestinian protests: a ex-political leader suggested that some were "linked with" foreign governments, while the sitting leader described such protests as antisemitic. In doing so, they contributed to normalizing the authoritarian crackdown on such protests – and on freedom of expression in general.

Looking Ahead

If a hard-right government comes to power, it would be granted extensive authority to control opposition. What might a new administration do with this restrictive framework? Our ancestors fought, endured hardship and died to establish our liberties. We may ultimately rue how casually we permitted them to be eroded.