🔗 Share this article

The acclaimed documentarian has become not just a filmmaker; his name is a franchise, a prolific creative force. With each new television endeavor arriving on the PBS network, everyone seeks his attention.

The filmmaker completed “more fucking podcasts than I ever thought possible”, he notes, nearing the end of nine-month promotional tour that included numerous locations, dozens of preview events and hundreds of interviews. “With podcasts numbering in the hundreds of millions, I feel I’ve participated in a substantial portion.”

Thankfully the filmmaker is incredibly dynamic, as loquacious behind the mic as he is productive in the editing room. The veteran director has appeared at locations ranging from historical sites to mainstream media outlets to discuss a career-defining series: his Revolutionary War documentary, a monumental six-part, 12-hour documentary series that dominated ten years of his career and arrived recently on public television.

Defiantly Traditional Approach

Like slow cooking in an age of fast food, The American Revolution intentionally classic, reminiscent of traditional war documentaries than the era of online content audio documentaries.

However, for the filmmaker, whose professional life documenting American historical narratives including baseball, country music, jazz and national parks, the revolutionary period transcends ordinary historical coverage but essential. “I recently told collaborator Sarah Botstein during our discussions, and she shared this view: no future work will carry greater importance,” Burns contemplates from his New York base.

Comprehensive Scholarly Work

Burns, co-directors Botstein and David Schmidt and screenwriter Geoffrey Ward referenced countless written sources and primary source materials. Dozens of historians, covering various ideological backgrounds, offered expert analysis in conjunction with distinguished researchers covering various specialties such as enslavement studies, Native American history plus colonial history.

Characteristic Narrative Method

The style of the series will appear similar to viewers of Burns’ earlier work. Its distinctive style featured methodical photographic exploration through archival photographs, extensive employment of contemporary scores featuring talent reading diaries, letters and speeches.

That was the moment the filmmaker cemented his status; decades afterwards, now the doyen of documentaries, he can attract numerous talented actors. Appearing alongside Burns at a recent event, renowned playwright Lin-Manuel Miranda noted: “Nobody declines an invitation from Ken Burns.”

Remarkable Ensemble

The decade-long production schedule also helped concerning availability. Sessions happened in studios, on location using online technology, a tool embraced throughout the health crisis. Burns recounts the experience with performer Josh Brolin, who found a few free hours while in Georgia to record his lines as George Washington then continuing to subsequent commitments.

The cast includes Kenneth Branagh, Hugh Dancy, Claire Danes, Jeff Daniels, Morgan Freeman, Paul Giamatti, diverse creative professionals, household names and rising talent, celebrated film and stage performers, international acting community, versatile character actors, television and film stars, Dan Stevens, Meryl Streep.

Burns adds: “Truly, this might be the most exceptional group recruited for any project. Their work is exceptional. They’re not picked because they’re celebrities. I became frustrated when someone asked, about the prominent cast. I explained, ‘These are artists.’ They are among the world’s best performers and they animate historical material.”

Nuanced Narrative

However, the lack of surviving participants, modern media compelled the production to lean heavily on the written word, combining personal accounts of nearly 200 individual historic figures. This allowed them to introduce audiences not only to the “bold-faced names” of that era plus numerous additional essential to the narrative, numerous individuals never even had a portrait painted.

Burns also indulged his particular enthusiasm for maps and spatial representation. “Maps fascinate me,” he notes, “featuring increased geographical representation in this project compared to previous works across my complete filmography.”

International Impact

The team filmed across multiple important places in various American regions and in London to preserve geographical atmosphere and partnered extensively with living history participants. Various aspects converge to present a narrative more violent, complex and globally significant versus conventional understanding.

The revolution, it contends, represented more than local dispute over land, taxation and representation. Instead the film portrays a violent confrontation that eventually involved more than two dozen nations and surprisingly represented described as “humanity’s highest ideals”.

Internal Conflict Truth

Early dissatisfaction and objections aimed at the crown by American colonists throughout multiple disputatious regions soon descended into a vicious internal war, pitting family members against each other and creating local enmities. In one segment, academic Alan Taylor comments: “The primary misunderstanding concerning independence struggle is that it was something that unified Americans. It leaves out the reality that colonists battled fellow colonists.”

Historical Complexity

According to his perspective, the revolution is a story that “for most of us is drowning in sentimentality and idealization and is incredibly superficial and insufficiently honors the historical reality, every individual involved and the incredible violence of it.

The historian argues, an uprising that declared the world-changing idea of fundamental personal liberties; a bloody domestic struggle, separating rebels and supporters; and a global war, another installment in a sequence of wars between imperial nations for the “prize of North America”.

Contingent Historical Events

Burns also wanted {to rediscover the