🔗 Share this article

Over the weekend, Battlefield Studios launched a new game mode titled Casual Breakthrough. To put it simply, this option resembles the regular Breakthrough setup but includes a few notable changes:

• Each team includes just 8 real players, with the rest made up of AI-controlled opponents.
• Activities performed by human gamers grant full XP, while AI activities provide lower rewards.
• Only two maps are available: Siege of Cairo and Empire State map.
• Elements like Player tags, achievements, and career stat updates are disabled.

So essentially, the playlist lives up to its name: it offers a laid-back version of Breakthrough. On the surface, you might think there's nothing wrong, as it gives additional choices for gamers seeking alternative ways to have fun with the title. However, gaming history has shown one thing, it is that you can't please everyone. Which is to say, many Battlefield 6 fans are mad.

Player Reactions: Anger to Praise

"People want real players. Don't repeat the errors of your rivals," reads a response to the official announcement. "Absolutely shocking idea," comments a different user. At the same time, on the Battlefield subreddit, a player remarks, "I have no idea where we are going with this title," while someone else details all the issues they believe to be broken in the game: "Fix bugs, address drone issues, correct rocket mechanics, fix [the] bloom after sprinting bug, improve hit detection. We do not require this bot mode."

On the other hand, for every complaint, some gamers sharing how much they're enjoying the recent addition. "It's very fun to practice, human participants keep it from being a total farmfest but it's very relaxed," says a forum post. "The community fails to see that there are players who have lives and don't play this title all the time. Allow them to strike a balance," states another. One reply via social media explains that as they're "a parent gamer with busy schedules, this is great for me," and another praises the mode for "avoiding intense competition."

Valid Concerns and Player Input

Despite the support, there are constructive reasons to criticize Casual Breakthrough. Some users have highlighted that it could increase wait times even longer for other modes due to the sheer number of playlists currently available. On a similar note, certain regions often face AI-filled matches in the existing playlists. It also seems somewhat counterintuitive that the mode does not begin without a minimum number of human gamers, despite it focuses mostly on fighting AI opponents.

Finally, one of the biggest grievances is that Battlefield Portal was promised to offer full XP, even against bots, but that was removed when they tried to eliminate XP farming from the system. Thus Casual Breakthrough feels like the player base compromising in the middle, as per a Reddit comment. A different user labels this mode as the devs "dropping the ball so hard, I experienced great enjoyment in the first couple of days, what prompted them to adjust it?"

Future Prospects: Adjustments Be Made?

Should Battlefield Studios has proven anything to date with the latest installment, it is that they're paying attention and acting on player input. Assignments being too difficult were adjusted very quickly, as did the specific battle pass objectives. It is likely that, if their data indicates this new playlist isn't performing to their standards, they won't be shy to change it again.