🔗 Share this article

The number of guaranteed seats for Indigenous council members on New Zealand councils will be cut by over 50%, after a controversial law change that forced municipal councils to put the fate of hard-earned Indigenous wards to a public vote.

Historical Context on Māori Wards

Māori wards, which may have multiple councillors based on local population numbers, were created in 2001 to provide Māori electors the choice to elect a assured Indigenous council member in municipal and provincial governments. Originally, local governments were only able to establish a Māori ward by first putting it to a public vote in their region. Communities frequently devoted considerable time generating local support and urging their councils to establish Māori wards.

Legislative Shifts and Administrative Decisions

To remedy the issue, the previous Labour government permitted municipal authorities to establish a Indigenous seat without initially mandating them to put it to a popular ballot.

However, this year, the right-wing coalition government reversed the change, saying local residents should decide whether to introduce Māori wards.

Referendum Results

The coalition’s law change mandated local authorities that had established a ward under Labour’s rules to conduct decisive public votes alongside the local body elections, which ended on 11 October. Of 42 councils participating in the public vote, 17 voted to retain their seats, and twenty-five to disestablish theirs – showing many regions opposed to guaranteed Māori representation.

These outcomes represented “a vital step in restoring local democratic control.”

Opposition parties however have criticised the government’s law change as “discriminatory” and “against Indigenous interests”. Since taking office, the coalition government has ushered in extensive reversals to measures designed to enhance Māori health, wellbeing and representation. The government has said it aims to terminate “ethnic-specific” approaches, and asserts it is dedicated to improving outcomes for Indigenous people and all New Zealanders.

Urban-Rural Divide

The results of the referendums were split down urban-rural lines – most urban centers required to vote backed Indigenous seats, while rural regions skewed heavily towards disestablishing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Indigenous seats that had recently been established – they’re only just starting to find their footing.”

Electoral Participation and Criticism

This year’s municipal polls recorded the lowest voter turnout in over three decades, with under one-third of citizens participating, leading to demands for reform.

The process had been “a farce”.

Comparative Treatment

Councils are permitted to create different wards – including rural wards – without first requiring a community ballot. The disparate requirements placed on Māori wards indicated the administration was singling out Māori representation.

“Ultimately, they were unsuccessful. Many communities have given the government a middle finger response.”

This remark concerned the 17 regions that voted to keep their seats.